Lesson - Energy And Orbits

The applet simulates the gravitational potential energy of a satellite-earth system or projectile-earth system along with the satellite's or projectile's kinetic energy and the total mechanical energy of the system.

Prerequisites

Students should be familiar with Newton's second law and Newton's universal law of gravitation. They should be familiar with the concept of potential energy and the expression for gravitational potential energy near the surface of the earth.

Learning Outcomes

Students will develop an understanding of how the gravitational potential energy of an object in the earth's gravitational field varies with the object's elevation above the surface of the earth, and they will learn to apply the law of energy conservation to predict the speed of an object moving in the earth's gravitational field.

Instructions

Students should know how the applet functions, as described in Help and ShowMe.

The applet should be open. The step-by-step instructions in the following text are to be done in the applet. You may need to toggle back and forth between instructions and applet if your screen space is limited.


Contents

Laws, Theorems, Terminology
Newton's Second Law
Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
Gravitational Potential Energy of Particle-Earth System
Mechanical Energy and Its Conservation

Potential Energy as Function of Satellite-Earth Distance

Energy Conservation

Appendix A: A Useful Expression for the Potential Energy

Appendix B: Approximation to the Potential Energy

Laws, Theorems, Terminology

Potential Energy as Function of Satellite-Earth Distance

Exercise 1. RESET the applet, and set the distance scale to 100 pix = 10 km.

Move the satellite to the north pole by setting x and y equal to 0. Hide the velocity vector, and set the speed to 0, to make the kinetic energy equal to 0. Press the Data button, and move the Data box to the left or close it so that the satellite can be seen.

Drag the satellite up and down with the mouse, and observe the potential energy changes, both by observing the "final" energy bar in the Energy box and by observing the values of PE and PE' in the Data box. You will have to move the energy scale slider up to be able to observe any changes in the length of the potential energy bar.

You should find that both PE and PE' increase as the satellite's elevation increases. (The PE-values are becoming less negative as the elevation increases, which means that they are increasing.)

Exercise 2. Switch the distance scale to 100 pix = 1,000 km, and continue to drag the satellite away from the earth. You will have to readjust the energy scale slider to bring the top end of the "final" energy bar into view.

You should be able to observe that as the distance of the satellite increases, the potential energy keeps on increasing.

Exercise 3. Continue in this manner, setting the distance scale to more and more zoomed-out positions and moving the satellite farther and farther from the earth. The potential energy should keep increasing until eventually PE will approach 0.

Question 1. Does it make sense for the gravitational potential energy to keep on increasing as the satellite's elevation increases?

Answer. Yes. When the satellite is released from rest, it will start falling towards the earth and gain kinetic energy. By energy conservation, this gain in kinetic energy is accompanied by a loss in potential energy. Thus, the potential energy must be greater at larger distances from the earth.

Question 2. Do Expressions (5) to (7) for the potential energy have the property that the potential energy increases as the satellite's distance from the earth increases?

Answer. The answer is obviously YES for Expression (5). To convince yourself that it is YES as well for Expressions (6) and (7), you may want to sketch PE as given by these expressions as a function of d. You should obtain a monotonically rising curve, as shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1

Energy Conservation

This section will deal with the conservation of mechanical energy in the two-body system consisting of the earth and a projectile or satellite and some of its applications.

Exercise 1. Read the sections titled "Gravitational Potential Energy of Particle-Earth System" and "Mechanical Energy and Its Conservation" at the beginning of the Lesson.

Exercise 2. RESET the applet. Set the distance scale to 100 pix = 10 km. Display the Energy box and drag the Data box out of the way. Set the initial position and velocity to

x = 0, y = 10 km

v = 400 m/s, θ = 30o

PLAY the motion, and display the trace. Observe changes in the potential and kinetic energies as displayed by the Energy bar. You will have to move the energy scale slider all the way to the top to be able to observe the changes in these energies.

Is the mechanical energy conserved during the motion? Do the potential and kinetic energies behave the way you would expect?

Question 1. For the initial conditions in Exercise 2, what is the initial value of the mechanical energy E' of the projectile-earth system?

Answer. The mechanical energy E' has the value

E'i = m/2 v2 + mgh

= (40/2)×4002 + 40×9.805×1×104

= 3.200×106 + 3.922×106

= 7.122×106 J. (13)

Compare these values with those shown in the Data box. The values of KE are exactly the same, but the values for PE' and E' calculated here are very close, but not exactly the same as those in the Data box. Why?

The values in the Data box are better because they take into account that the acceleration due to gravity is not a constant equal to 9.805 m/s2, but decreases as one goes away from the earth. Note that the value of a, the magnitude of the projectile's acceleration, is given in the Data box as 9.774 m/s2 at y = 10 km. This is the acceleration due to gravity at that elevation, and it is a little bit less than g.

If you want to calculate the projectile's potential energy and mechanical energy at y = 10 km exactly, use Expressions (6) or (7) for the potential energy. The results should agree with the values given in the Data box.

Question 2. With what speed does the projectile hit the ground?

Answer. The mechanical energy of the projectile-earth system is conserved during the projectile's flight. Therefore, the final energy E'f, just before the projectile hits the ground, is equal to the initial energy E'i which has the approximate value (13) above. Using this value and the final elevation hf = 0 gives the equation

m/2 vf2 + mghf = (40/2) vf2 + 0 = 7.122×106 J (14)

whence

vf = (7.122×106 / 20) = 5.967×102 m/s.(15)

Compare this value with the value 5.966×102 m/s which can be calculated from the final velocity components given in the Data box. The two values are very close.

Comment. One can avoid using the mass in these calculations by not calculating the energy first. Just use the equation for energy conservation,

(m/2) vi2 + mghi = (m/2) vf2 + mghf,(16)

and cancel the common factor of m out of all terms. Substituting the given values of vi, hi, and hf, one can then solve for vf. Do this, and compare your answer with value (15) above.

Exercise 3. RESET the applet. Set the distance scale to the most zoomed-out setting: 100 pix = 100,000 km. Select the Data button and drag the Data box off to one side, but keep the Energy box in view. Set the initial position and velocity to

(x,y)(0) = (0, 50,000) km ,

v = 1,000 m/s, θ = 0o .

You should find that the potential energy bar in the "final" column extends beyond the top of the window. Drag the Zoom slider in the Energy box downward until the energy level 0.0 mgR and the top of the "final" energy column come into view.

The top of the "final" energy column should be very near -0.1 mgR.

Press the Lock-Initial-Energy button so that the "initial" energy bar is adjusted to look like the "final" energy bar, select the Trace button, and PLAY the motion. Observe the changes in potential and kinetic energy.

The motion will be slow at first. PAUSE it at some point. You might see something like the snapshot in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2

At the moment shown in Figure 2, the potential energy has decreased and the speed and kinetic energy have increased compared with the initial moment. Is that what you would have expected? Is the mechanical energy conserved?

Click PLAY again, and watch the motion until the satellite crashes into the earth. The initial speed of the satellite is not large enough to carry the satellite around the earth.

At the moment of the crash, the potential energy should be equal to -1.0 mgR, which is its value when the satellite is at the surface of the earth.

Question 3. At the start of the motion, what is the value of the energy E of the satellite-earth system?

Answer. Using Expression (7) for the potential energy, the mechanical energy E can be calculated as follows.

E = m/2 v2 - mgR (R/d)

= (40/2)×1,0002 - 40×9.805×6.378×106×(6,378/56,378)

= 2.000×107 - 2.830×108

= - 2.630×108 J. (17)

Compare these values with those shown in the Data box. They should agree.

Question 4. Given the intial values from Exercise 3, with what speed does the satellite crash into the earth?

Answer. The calculation of the final value vf of the speed is analogous to that in Question 2. The only difference is that here the exact potential energy must be used instead of Approximation (5). Approximation (5) is not valid here because the elevation of the satellite above the earth is not small compared to R. We will use Expression (7) for the potential energy.

With that, and using value (17) for E and df = R, the analog of Equ.(14) becomes

Ef = m/2 vf2 - mgR (R/df)

= (40/2) vf2 - mgR

= Ei = -2.630×108 J

whence

20 vf2 - mgR = -2.630×108 J. (18)

With the value of mgR inserted into Equ.(18),

mgR = 40×9.805×6.378×106 = 2.50145×109 J,(19)

solving the resulting equation for vf gives

vf = [(2.50145×109 - 2.630×108) / 20]

= 1.058×104 m/s.(20)

Check that this value is consistent with those of the final velocity and the final kinetic energ of the satellite given in the Data box. The values should agree within the number of significant digits listed here.

Comment 1. If the approximate potential energy (5), rather than the exact potential energy (7), had been used to calculate vf, a totally incorrect result would have been obtained. You may want to do this calculation. The reason for the incorrect result is, of course, that the condition h << R under which Approximation (5) is good is severely violated in the present situation.

Comment 2. As in Question 2, one can avoid using the mass in calculating vf by not calculating the energy first. Just use the equation for energy conservation,

(m/2) vi2 - mgR (R/di) = (m/2) vf2 - mgR (R/df),(21)

and cancel the common factor of m out of all terms. Substituting the given values of vi, di, and df = R, one can then solve for vf. Do this, and compare your answer with result (20) above.

Appendix A: A Useful Expression for the Potential Energy

By multiplying Expression (6) for the potential energy PE,

PE = -GMm / d , (6)

by R2/R2 = 1 and rearranging, one can write it in the form

PE = -m[GM / R2]R(R/d) . (A1)

It turns out that the expression in square brackets is equal to g. This can be shown as follows.

Let us consider a satellite just above the surface of the earth, so that d = R. The acceleration of such a satellite has the magnitude g, if the only force acting on the satellite is the force of gravity. In this situation, Newton's second law applied to the satellite with Expression (4) for the satellite's weight,

W = GMm / d2 ,

and g substituted for the magnitude a of the satellite's acceleration gives the equation

GMm / R2 = m g . (A2)

Dividing both sides of this equation by m gives

GM / R2 = g. (A3)

Thus, substituting g for the expression in square brackets in Equ.(A1) gives the useful Expression (7) for the potential energy PE,

PE = -mgR (R/d) .

Appendix B: Approximation to the Potential Energy

In this Appendix we will derive Expression (5) for the potential energy near the surface of the earth, i.e., for a satellite elevation h that is much smaller than the radius R of the earth. The notation PE(d) will denote the value of the potential energy PE when the satellite is at a distance d from the center of the earth.

When a particle is moved from the surface of the earth, at d = R, to a point a distance h above the surface of the earth, at d = R + h, the potential energy PE changes by

PE(R+h) - PE(R). (A4)

Using form (7) for PE, this change can be written

PE(R+h) - PE(R) = -mgR [R/(R+h - R/R]

= -mgR [1/(1+h/R) - 1]. (A5)

For h << R, which is equivalent to h/R << 1, the first term in the square brackets can be approximated to a very good degree if we use the general approximation

1/(1+x) = 1 - x, if |x| << 1. (A6)

Use a calculator to check how good the approximation is by using, say, x = 0.01 and evaluating the left and right hand sides of Approximation (A6).

Approximation (A6) written down for x = h/R amounts to

1/(1+h/R) = 1 - h/R, if h/R << 1. (A7)

Substituting Approximation (A7) into Equ.(A5) simplifies the latter to

PE(R+h) - PE(R) = -mgR [1 - h/R - 1]

= mgR [h/R] = mgh. (A8)

Thus,

PE(R+h) = mgh + PE(R), if h << R. (A9)

The first term on the right-hand side in Approximation (A9) is Expression (5) for the potential energy PE'. The second term on the right-hand side, PE(R) is a constant equal to -mgR. This establishes Equ.(8).

Of course, it is much easier to derive Expression (5) for the potential energy by using the definition of potential energy in terms of work done by the force of gravity and taking that force to have the constant magnitude mg, near the surface of the earth. The demonstration given here has the merit that it explains how the two very different looking expressions for the potential energy, Expressions (5) and (6) or (7), are related.